Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise upgrade#
Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise full#
Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise software#
Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise trial#
Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise iso#

For installation and usage see Readme.md. It includes an export provider for PureRAW and allows to set some metadata on the sent photos (rating, color label, flags).

Price is to high, at least for a tool with such less controlsīy the way: To make my workflow even smoother, I developed a LR plug-in.

Export the processed DNG and import them back to LR.

Set color label to yellow on the photos which were sent to PureRAW (to have a useable indicator).

If a 'rated' photo shows up noise, send the DNG to PureRAW.

Rating the photos (decide which photos are worth a closer look).

Very good results without the need to do adjustments.

But yes, in the long run, I will have the need for fine tuning. That’s not a knock on Topaz Denoise AI it’s a great program, and it shines for its best use case. There are limited controls so there is no learning curve.Ĭlick to expand.Thanks Paul, that's what I did, and I'm quite happy with PureRAW so far. DxO PureRAW offers a wide range of benefits for the all-around nature photographer whereas Topaz Denoise AI is useful for removing noise and adding sharpening for traditional telephoto nature portraiture. I would urge others to download and try it themselves especially if they don't use an external DeNoise/Sharpening tools. You can reset the image but the lens correction stays. The DNG from Topaz always seems a little bit more suspect to me. Its almost like using a real raw file, without the noise.

Sharpening and denoise are zeroed which makes sense because of the preprocessing. Ive extensively tested DXO since a few years, and less Denoise (but I have the last version), and I see less shift in hue or lightness when using the DNG from DXO than from Denoise.

The Amount control is showing for Adobe Color profile which it normally isn't.

The DNG file imported into LrC with 'Development Settings' showing.

One recommended workflow for noisy images is to denoise first then make edits but PureRAW seems to be doing both.

Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise iso#

As the ISO increase, and need for more aggressive denoise, PureRAW adjusts the tonality of the photo.

Reminds me of the choices of Topaz DeNoise methods but there, I have tweaking I can do on noise and sharpening settings. There is only a control for method of denoise in PureRAW.

I feel I'm loosing control of the workflow.

LrC recognizes this and stops me from applying them again.

A problem I found was that it applies lens correction to my E-PM1 ORF files even though those are done in camera.

I don't have a need for extensive lens correction.

I feel Topaz DeNoise and Sharpening do the job I need and I have control on how they are applied.

I am not sure if I'm gaining anything using DxO's RAW converter over LrC's.

PureRAW is giving me a preprocessed version of my RAW file in DNG format but I am not clear about everything it is doing.

PureRAW is not a product I will be using for the following personal reasons. I have not tried DxO Photolab which someone suggested as a comparison.

Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise trial#

I downloaded a trial version of DxO PureRAW and tried it on some older pictures with ISO ranging from 400-25,600. For post processing, I use LrC and Topaz DeNoise and Sharpen.

To compare the differences between DxO PhotoLab ESSENTIAL and ELITE EDITION from this article, please click on this link and refer to the second tab called 'Compare Editions'.I've already commented on another post on PureRAW but here are some of my personal conclusions.įor background, I shoot with a Nikon D5300 and Olympus E-PM1 micro four thirds. The products are sold separately, there are no cross-upgrades available.

Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise full#

If you choose to start with DxO PureRAW and wish to have more control later on, you’d need to buy a full license for DxO PhotoLab ELITE Edition.

Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise upgrade#

If you choose to start with DxO PhotoLab ESSENTIAL Edition, you can always upgrade to DxO PhotoLab ELITE Edition in the future in order to take advantage of PRIME, DeepPRIME and DeepPRIME XD noise correction features. However, compared to DxO PureRAW it only offers HQ denoising rather than PRIME, DeepPRIME, or DeepPRIME XD noise reduction. It offers tools for color and exposure correction, local corrections, keywords, and much more. PhotoLab ESSENTIAL is a comprehensive solution on a budget.

Please note: There are two Editions available for DxO PhotoLab, ESSENTIAL, and ELITE EDITION. The new enhanced batch processing with the option to shuffle the order of images and priority within a batch is a strong argument for DxO PureRAW 3.

Dxo pureraw vs topaz denoise software#

However, if you already have software for image editing, but you are looking for a very powerful tool for denoising and very precise optical corrections but you want to keep your current workflow, DxO PureRAW will be the perfect choice for you.

If you don't have any photo editing software and are just starting with photography, DxO PhotoLab is a comprehensive solution. This information applies to version(s): 1, 2, 3ĭxO PhotoLab ELITE Edition and DxO PureRAW are based on the same engine and you can expect the same results for denoising and optical corrections.